The Importance of a Data Asset Control System
Why a Data Asset Control System is Essential for Data Media Destruction
Federal Data Privacy regulations and many State Identity Theft Laws require that you know where your sensitive data resides and that you can prove it is secure at all times.
When your data resides online, asset control can be automated. Most times, an organization’s data security process maintains it’s security. That often includes tracking of the devices that are deployed to employees. Once the devices become obsolete and are removed from the online system, tracking and security become a manual activity.
To ensure control of decommissioned devices, it is essential to establish an auditable “chain of possession” record. This should document the control of the device from its initial de-installation from your IT system to the final NIST approved destruction of the equipment.
Asset Control for the Data on Decommissioned Devices
Excerpt from NIST SP 800-88:
One method to sanitize media is to use software or hardware products to overwrite user addressable storage space on the media with non-sensitive data, using the standard read and write commands for the device. This process may include overwriting not only the logical storage location of a file(s) (e.g., file allocation table) but also should include all user addressable locations. The security goal of the overwriting process is to replace target data with non-sensitive data. Overwriting cannot be used for media that are damaged or not rewriteable, and may not address all areas of the device where sensitive data may be retained. The media type and size may also influence whether overwriting is a suitable sanitization method. For example, flash memory-based storage devices may contain spare cells and perform wear levelling, making it infeasible for a user to sanitize all previous data using this approach because the device may not support directly addressing all areas where sensitive data has been stored using the native read and write interface. The clear operation may vary contextually for media other than dedicated storage devices, where the device (such as a basic cell phone or a piece of office equipment) only provides the ability to return the device to factory state (typically by simply deleting the file pointers) and does not directly support the ability to rewrite or apply media-specific techniques to the non-volatile storage contents.
Where rewriting is not supported, manufacturer resets and procedures that do not include rewriting might be the only option to clear the device and associated media. These still meet the definition for clear as long as the device interface available to the user does not facilitate retrieval of the cleared data.”
Some methods of purging (which vary by media and must be applied with considerations described further throughout this document) include overwrite, block erase, and cryptographic erase, through the use of dedicated, standardized device sanitize commands that apply media-specific techniques to bypass the abstraction inherent in typical read and write commands. Destructive techniques also render the device purged when effectively applied to the appropriate media type, including incineration, shredding, disintegrating, degaussing, and pulverizing. The common benefit across all these approaches is assurance that the data is infeasible to recover using state of the art laboratory techniques. However, bending, cutting, and the use of some emergency procedures (such as using a firearm to shoot a hole through a storage device) may only damage the media as portions of the media may remain undamaged and therefore accessible using advanced laboratory techniques.
Degaussing renders a legacy magnetic device purged when the strength of the degausser is carefully matched to the media coercivity. Coercivity may be difficult to determine based only on information provided on the label. Therefore, refer to the device manufacturer for coercivity details. Degaussing should never be solely relied upon for flash memory-based storage devices or for magnetic storage devices that also contain non-volatile non-magnetic storage. Degaussing renders many types of devices unusable (and in those cases, degaussing is also a destruction technique).
There are many different types, techniques, and procedures for media destruction. While some techniques may render the target data infeasible to retrieve through the device interface and unable to be used for subsequent storage of data, the device is not considered destroyed unless target data retrieval is infeasible using state of the art laboratory techniques.
• Disintegrate, pulverize, melt, and incinerate. These sanitization methods are designed to completely destroy the media. They are typically carried out at an outsourced metal Destruction or licensed incineration facility with the specific capabilities to perform these activities effectively, securely, and safely.
• Shred. Paper shredders can be used to destroy flexible media such as diskettes once the media are physically removed from their outer containers. The shred size of the refuse should be small enough that there is reasonable assurance in proportion to the data confidentiality that the data cannot be reconstructed. To make reconstructing the data even more difficult, the shredded material can be mixed with non-sensitive material of the same type (e.g., shredded paper or shredded flexible media).
The application of destructive techniques may be the only option when the media fails and other clear or purge techniques cannot be effectively applied to the media, or when the verification of clear or purge methods fails (for known or unknown reasons).
Back Thru The Future’s handling procedures provides our clients with auditable records of the documented and secure multiple step transfer from your secure storage to the final NIST approved data media destruction. The entire process is NAID AAA certified secure.
100% of our client quality control surveys rate both our pre-project and
post-project communications as “Excellent”
92% of our new client quality control surveys have been returned marked “exceeded expectations”.
Why not get a project price quote and find out how inexpensive great service can be?